Legal Opinion
Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1990No. E005891PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
The appeal here is from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc. (Goldmine), in an action arising from serious personal injuries suffered by plaintiff Vicki L. Danieley when she collided with a tree while skiing on lands in the San Bernardino Mountains, operated by Goldmine as a ski area. In the first count of the complaint Goldmine was charged with negligence in the operation and maintenance of the premises, which included the ski run next to which plaintiff Vicki L. Danieley was injured. More specifically, the complaint alleged that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ferrari v. Grand Canyon DoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cheong v. AntablinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.