Legal Opinion

Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 19, 2001No. 99CV797PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (“ODRC”), Reginald A. Wilkinson, Patricia Andrews and Rukhsa-na Akram. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on September 28, 2000. The case is in federal court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction.

Plaintiff Ernest Allen brought suit against ODRC, Akram in her individual capacity and Wilkinson, Andrews…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johari v. City of Columbus Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  2. Estate of McFarlin v. City of Storm LakeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  3. Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Miller v. Delaware, Department of Probation & ParoleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001
  5. Wagner v. Merit DistributionDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API