Legal Opinion
Miller v. Delaware, Department of Probation & Parole
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 28, 2001No. Civ.A. 98-553-GMS, Civ.A. 99-565-GMSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SLEET, District Judge.
On September 24, 1998, Ivanhoe F. Miller (“Miller”), filed a pro se complaint alleging that his employer, State of Delaware Department of Probation and Parole, a division of the Department of Correction (“DOC”), violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, Miller alleges that the DOC suspended and later terminated his employment based on his race. On August 20, 1999, Miller filed a companion case concerning the same set of facts alleging that the DOC retaliated against him when he complained of their alleged discriminatory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. Wachovia Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Martin v. Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones, P.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Weaver v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004