Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
By order nisi dated September 9, 1957, the Public Utility Commission proposed a new regulation applicable to passenger train service. This new regulation was a supplement to the Commission’s Railroad Regulations and was designated Rule 10. Railroads furnishing passenger train service in the Commonwealth filed exceptions, whereupon the Commission conducted a hearing at which the railroads offered evidence in opposition to the proposed rule. By final order dated March 24, 1958, Commissioner Houck dissenting, the Commission adopted its new Rule 10 in a form differing from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Coplay Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Day v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Armour Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morey v. School Board of Independent School District No. 492Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- PECO Energy Co. v. Township of Upper DublinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Harmer Coal Co., Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board1974
- Paulussen v. HerionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Paulussen v. HerionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986