Armour Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
This appeal had its origin in a proceeding instituted by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, upon its own motion, against the Armour Transportation Company, the appellant herein, to determine whether or not penalties and forfeitures should be imposed for operating in violation of the Public Utility Law of 1937. The Commission, after hearing, by order, dated April 25, 1939, revoked and rescinded the respondent’s rights as a common carrier, directing it to cease and desist as such, and imposed a fine of $500. The appellant asserts that this order is void because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Railroad Commission v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Automobile Corp. v. BarfodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pittsburgh Press Employment Advertising Discrimination AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Begis v. Industrial Board of the Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.