Legal Opinion
Matter of Ross
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1983No. 11114PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
As set forth in our original opinion, a number of charges of professional misconduct were initiated before the Board of Bar Governors, accusing petitioners Ross and Flangas of conspiring in diverse ways with another attorney and with District Judge Richard Waters. See In re Ross, 99 Nev. 1, 656 P.2d 832 (1983). Following an extensive and costly, but unproductive investigation, a week-long hearing was held before the Board of Governors. The Board then ascertained and expressly found that there was neither evidence to substantiate any of several charges of…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Cannon v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Matter of RossNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Lorring's PetitionNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Peter L. Flangas v. State Bar of Nevada, John C. Mowbray, Gordon Thompson, Cameron M. Batjer and Noel ManoukianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Revocation of Certificate or License of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of Estate of HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Sloan v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.