Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal & Hearing From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for Yaroch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1983No. 13724PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Appellant (employee) filed a claim of unemployment compensation benefits which claim was contested by his former employer The Austad Company (employer), a sporting goods supplier. After a hearing, employee was awarded benefits by the hearing examiner for the Department of Labor (Department). However, pursuant to SDCL 61-7-12, the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) made additional findings on one issue not relevant to our decision here and entered conclusions diametrically opposed to the hearing examiner on all other issues and denied the employee benefits. 1 Employee appealed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Detroit Gravure Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Claims of Heilman v. United Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Weatherwax v. Hiland Potato Chip Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Powell v. Division of Employment Security, Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kienast v. Sioux Valley Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Raml v. Jenkins Methodist HomeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API