Legal Opinion

Tyner v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 20, 2011No. S11A0253PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

This is Curtis Tyner’s much delayed direct appeal of his 1984 malice murder conviction based on his guilty plea. Because the case is here on direct appeal and the record does not show that Tyner was advised of his right against self-incrimination as we have held is required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274) (1969), his guilty plea was invalid and we must reverse his conviction.

1. According to the factual basis offered in support of the guilty plea, in April 1984, IBM executive Martha Anne Mickel hired Tyner to paint her apartment. On April 15,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Goodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Kilgore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Tyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  5. Tyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API