Kilgore v. State

McFADDEN, Judge.

After a jury trial, James Kilgore was convicted of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because there is enough evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found Kilgore guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm.

1. Jurisdiction.

“It is the duty of this [c]ourt in all instances to inquire into our jurisdiction.” Segura v. State, 280 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) (634 SE2d 858) (2006) (footnote omitted). In that regard, the record shows that the jury returned its guilty verdict on November 1,2011,…