Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1999No. S98G1663PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

A jury found Nash guilty of aggravated assault. At his sentencing hearing, the State introduced for purposes of recidivist punishment, see OCGA § 17-10-7, a certified copy of a guilty plea Nash had entered to a prior felony. Nash objected to the admission of the guilty plea on the ground that the plea had not been entered into knowingly and voluntarily. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274) (1969). The State was not able to produce the transcript of the earlier plea hearing and instead adduced the testimony of the prosecutor, present when Nash pled…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. von Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Arrington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Heidler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Brockman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API