Legal Opinion
Farmers' State Bank of Huntsville v. Inman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 6, 1922No. 8 Div. 416PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLEBLAN, J.
Bill in equity, filed by appellee against appellant and others. There was decree for complainant (appellee), following decrees pro confesso.
The return of the sheriff, indorsed on the summons to the appellant corporation, is in these words:
“I have executed the within by handing a. copy of the same to Farmers’ State Bank by leaving a copy with Robt. Adair, cashier, this-10th day of December, 1920.”
The act approved September 17, 1915 (Gen. Acts, pp. 607-608), amending Code, § 5303,. reads:
“That section 5303 of the Code of Alabama be and is hereby amended so as to read: 5303. How Corporation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sodini v. SodiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Blinn v. ChessmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- McGowin v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Fears v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Sawyer v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levy, Aronson & White v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Fellows v. BurkettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Farmers' State Bank v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Walls v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.