Levy, Aronson & White v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled. It was not in accordance with section 5 of the act of February 15, 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 85). Jacobs v. Goodwater Graphite Co., 205 Ala. 112, 87 South. 363.
Counts 1 and 2 of the complaint were the common counts for open and stated accounts. Counts 3 and 4 claimed a certain sum of the defendant for moneys expended by plaintiffs for defendant’s use and at his request in the purchase and sale of cotton for future delivery upon the New Orleans Cotton Exchange. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and special pleas that the contracts sued on were future…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Wyman v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Prowell v. State ex rel. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- American Standard Life Ins. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lovett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Coffman v. FoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.