Legal Opinion

Farmers' State Bank v. Inman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1922No. 8 Div. 412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

“The errors which will support a bill of review are errors of law apparent on the face of the decree. There must be error in substance, of prejudice to the party complaining, apparent on the face of the pleadings, proceedings or decree. * * * Or, as it is expressed, in 2 Dan. Ch. Pr. 1576, ‘the decree complained of, must be contrary to some statutory enactment, or some principle or rule of law or equity, recognized and acknowledged, or settled by decision, or be at variance with the forms and practice of the court’ ” McCall v. McCurdy, 69 Ala. 65, 71.

1. In the proceeding under review the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Humes v. Decatur Land Im. & Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Manhattan Fire Insurance v. Fowler & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Valenzuela v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. &198tna Ins. Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Palatine Ins. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Walls v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API