Legal Opinion

Blinn v. Chessman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant, George Chessman, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made September 1%, 1891, refusing a new trial. Luretta J. Blinn, plaintiff, by her complaint alleged that she was the owner and in possession of Lot three (3) in Block eight (8) in Demmon’s Addition to North Minneapolis, and that defendant, George Chessman, claimed an adverse interest .or estate in it, and asked judgment determining such adverse claim.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, George Chessman, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made September 1%, 1891, refusing a new trial. Luretta J. Blinn, plaintiff, by her complaint alleged that she was the owner and in possession of Lot three (3) in Block eight (8) in Demmon’s Addition to North Minneapolis, and that defendant, George Chessman, claimed an adverse interest .or estate in it, and asked judgment determining such adverse claim. Defendant answered claiming title to the lot. On October 12, 1857, Wm. E. Forrest owned the lot, and on that day he and wife sold it to…

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The land, the title to which is the subject of this action, was purchased by the defendant George Chessman from one Forrest in 1857. A deed of conveyance was executed to the defend*145ant, and be caused it to be recorded. It appears from the record of the deed, and was found by the court, that in the deed the name of the grantee was written “George Cheeseman,” the name being so written in the instrument as recorded, as well as in the index of the same. It was found as a fact that the defendant knew, when he accepted and recorded the deed, that his name therein was thus erroneously written. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hartman v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  3. People v. BaenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Ray v. American Photo Player Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Semingson v. Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API