Legal Opinion

State v. Dingman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1923PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

— On the 22d day of December, 1919, the prosecuting attorney of Bonner county, Idaho, charged appellant jointly with twenty-two others:

“Of the crime of ¡a felony, to wit: The advocacy of the doctrine of criminal syndicalism, which doctrine' advocates crime, sabotage, violence and unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial and political reform, committed as follows, to wit:
“That the said William Dingman (and 22 others) and each of them, on or about the 14th day of November, 1919, in Bonner County, Idaho, then and there being, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  3. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. MoilenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API