State v. Moilen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendants were indicted by the grand jury for tbe crime of criminal syndicalism, tried in the district court for St. Louis county before Freeman, J., and a jury which found defendant Maki guilty of the crime charged in the indictment. At the request of the convicted defendant the case was certified to the supreme court upon the two questions set out in the first paragraph of the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Defendants were jointly indicted by the grand jury of St. Louis county, and thereby charged with the crime of criminal syndicalism, as that crime is defined and declared by chapter 215, p. 311, Laws 1917. Defendant Maki on a separate trial was found guilty as charged in the indictment, and at his instance and before sentence was pronounced the cause was certified to this court for the determination of two questions, namely:
*114(1) Is the statute on which the prosecution is founded a valid constitutional law? and if valid(2) Do the facts presented by the indictment and certified record constitute…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Fairbanks Publishing Company v. FranciscoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.