Legal Opinion

Reed v. Firemen's Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1911PublishedCited by 35 opinions

On error fo the Supreme ("hurt.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by .

Voorhees, J.

This is a suit on a fire insurance policy issued by the Firemen’s Insurance Company, to Ignatz Fabrikant, insuring him against direct loss or damage by fire, on two frame buildings in Hoboken, H. J. The body of the policy contained the following: “Loss, if any, payable to David F. and James A. Reed, mortgagees, mortgagee clause attached.” The mortgagee clause, which was attached to the policy, as well as the policy itself, was the standard form. The suit is brought by the mortgagee.

The policy bears date October 9th, 1903, and on February…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Seyk v. Millers' National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Sun Insurance v. Greenville Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Laurenzi v. Atlas Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Germania Fire Insurance v. BallyArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Fire Ass'n v. Evansville Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. B. L. Asso. v. Fire Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API