Legal Opinion

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Pence

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1964No. 37232PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Dr. Lawrence C. Pence engaged Tom Mykle-bust, a building contractor, to build a new house for him in Spokane. They signed a formal contract in November, 1960, in which Myklebust agreed, for the sum of $28,267.80, to complete the house, supplying all materials and labor, in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Dr. Pence’s architect. The building contract provided that Dr. Pence deposit the $28,267.80 in periodic payments with the Land Title Company of Spokane as escrow agent, and the Land Title Company, in turn, make “all payments to the sub-contractors and all payments to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Anderson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Escalante v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. D. Jean Pope, and Quali-Built, Inc. v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound, and Ticor Title Insurance Co. And Bruce H. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API