Legal Opinion
Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corporation, an Oregon Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1962No. 17575_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEES, District Judge.
The appeal in this diversity case tests the correctness of the trial court’s determination that there was evidence from which the jury could find that a contract existed between appellant (MCS) and respondent (Gunderson).
The material facts are substantially undisputed. Early in 1956, Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington (P.U.D.), advertised for bids to construct Priest Rapids Dam on the Columbia River at Ephrata, Washington. 1 Prior to March 10, 1956, MCS informed Gunderson that it was preparing to bid as general contractor on Priest Rapids Dam. MCS…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Fox Smith Sheet Metal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Schuehle v. SchuehleWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Pacific Mercantile Agency, Inc. v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Pavel Enterprises, Inc. v. AS Johnson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Electrical Construction & Maintenance Company, Inc. v. Maeda Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Evans v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Fluor Corp. v. United States ex rel. Mosher Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.