Legal Opinion

Mir v. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 22, 2016No. 3:15-cv-2766-BPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. (“L-3” or “Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Compel Signed Releases from Plaintiff Peter Mir (“Mir” or “Plaintiff’) [Dkt. No. 26] (the “MTC”), seeking an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) to require Mir to complete, execute, and return Form SSA-3288 “Consent for the Release of Information” and an “Authorization for Release of Information” from Alsup Inc. as L-3 has requested pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a).

United States District…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Crosby v. Louisiana Health Service and Indem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. Hershel Hiram McKnight v. C. H. Blanchard, Sheriff of Lubbock County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Yang Kun "Michael" ChungDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  2. Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. (PC) Torres v. GipsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Addison v. Louisiana Regional Landfill CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
  5. Autin v. Tidewater Dock IncDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API