Legal Opinion

(PC) Torres v. Gipson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2020No. 1:16-cv-01525Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN MATIAS TORRES, CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1525-NONE-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 13 v. 14 (Doc. 92) CONNIE GIPSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff moves for an order compelling Defendants to submit further responses to one 18 interrogatory and two requests for production of documents. (Doc. 92.) Defendants oppose the 19 motion. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion to compel will be denied. 20 I. Plaintiff’s Allegations 21 Plaintiff is a pro se state inmate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Garneau v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  5. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API