Autin v. Tidewater Dock Inc
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JERRY AUTIN * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 22-3202 TIDEWATER DOCK, INC., ET AL. * SECTION “B” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Before me is Plaintiff Jerry Autin’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. ECF No. 27. Defendant Tidewater Dock, Inc. timely filed an Opposition Memorandum. ECF No. 28. No party requested oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 78.1, and the Court agrees that oral argument is unnecessary. Having considered the record, the submissions and arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 27) is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Crosby v. Louisiana Health Service and Indem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.