Legal Opinion
Workman v. O'BRYAN
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2011No. 29A05-1003-PL-00169PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Chief Judge.
Case Summary and Issue
On interlocutory appeal, Dr. Frank Workman appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment in this medical malpractice case brought by Ann O’Bryan. The sole issue for our review is whether Dr. Workman is entitled to summary judgment on the two-year occurrence-based statute of limitations. Concluding that Dr. Workman is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History 1
This case arises from O’Bryan’s proposed complaint, filed in 2007, alleging negligence by Dr. Workman in failing to diagnose…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anonymous Physician v. Diana Wininger, Stephen Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Insurance, and Douglass J. Hill, Panel ChairIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Houser v. KaufmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jessica Szamocki v. Anonymous Doctor and Anonymous Group, and Stephen Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Martinez v. ParkIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011