Legal Opinion

In Re Cashmere State Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1932No. 23786. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These cases, consolidated, present two questions for our determination: (1) May the state supervisor of banking, as liquidator of an insolvent bank, make a loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, pledging as security for such loan the assets of the insolvent bank, and use the proceeds of the loan to pay the claims of preferred creditors and declare a first dividend to depositors and general creditors of the insolvent bank? (2) Has the court the power to approve the making of such loan? The two questions are closely related, and will be considered together in our discussion.

The facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Sheely v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Moore v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Bryan v. BullockSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. Cartmell v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hall v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Seaborn v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dalton v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Attorney General v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Andrew v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API