Legal Opinion
MHC Financing Limited Partnership Two v. City of Santee
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 2005No. D042631, D043129PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
Under Elections Code 1 section 9215, the city council of defendant City of Santee (the City) adopted without alteration a mobilehome rent control ordinance that was proposed by an initiative petition. However, it was later discovered that as a result of administrative mistake and inadvertence, there were differences between the text of the ordinance the City adopted (Ordinance 381) and that of the ordinance that was circulated with the initiative petition. The City eventually sought to cure the defects in the enactment of Ordinance 381 by enacting the correct version of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Benito Acosta v. City of Costa MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.