Legal Opinion

Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 2, 2011No. Nos. 06-835C, 06-853C, 06-858CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HORN, J.

Prior to the upcoming trial of the above numbered, consolidated eases, defendant filed a Motion in Limine to exclude the expert report of Steven R. Perry, a proposed expert witness for plaintiff Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group). Defendant argues that the opinions expressed by Mr. Perry in his expert report are legal conclusions and invade the province of the court. Defendant also argues that, based on the case of United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417 (1951), the Army’s “Touhy regulations” at 32 C.F.R. § 516.49(a)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Stobie Creek Investments LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Soriano-JarquinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Capitol Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Koopmann v. U.S. Dep't of Transp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Gordon v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API