Legal Opinion

Stobie Creek Investments LLC v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 11, 2010No. 2008-5190PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROST, Circuit Judge.

This tax refund suit concerns a series of transactions exemplifying the Son of BOSS 1 tax shelter, marketed here as the Jenkens & Gilchrist (“J & G”) strategy. The shelter took advantage of the fact that assets and contingent liabilities were treated differently for tax purposes when con tributed to a partnership, thus enabling the taxpayer to generate an artificial loss. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 722, 733, 752, 754; see also IRS Notice No.2000-44, 2000-2 C.B. 255, 2000 WL 1138430. This artificial loss is then used to offset income from other transactions.

In this case, the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. The Black & Decker Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Southgate Master Fund, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Montgomery Capital Advisors, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. 106 Ltd. v. Commissioner, IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Yung v. Grant Thornton, LLPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Fidelity International Currency Advisor a Fund, LLC Ex Rel. Tax Matters Partner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Wells Fargo & Co. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API