Legal Opinion
Katzin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 28, 2015No. 12-384LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pre-trial motion in limine; expert testimony on title to property beginning with grants from the Spanish crown and affected by the scope of a seaside reservation and maritime zone; Fed. R. Evid. 702; testimony by video teleconference; RCFC 43
ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
In this takings case, pending before the court is defendant’s motion in limine, filed September 4, 2015, to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ proffered expert witness, Dennis Martinez, pursuant to Rule 16(c)(2)(D) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). 1 Also pending before the court is defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco Ab, Atlas Copco Tools Ab, Atlas Copco North America, Inc., and Atlas Copco Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Bernadette Barroso, et al. v. Santa Croce Anesthesia, P.S.C., et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026