Legal Opinion
Sneed v. County of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 11, 1963No. Civ. 7054PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (Gerald), J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered after demurrers were sustained to the first amended supplemental complaint without leave to amend.
The first amended supplemental complaint (hereinafter called complaint) seeks to establish a cause of action in inverse condemnation against defendant County of Riverside, with the proceeds of such action belonging to plaintiff and not to defendants James Minor and Jessie F. Minor (hereinafter called Minor).
The only question is whether the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. For that purpose the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Peacock v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Aaron v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.