Legal Opinion
Peacock v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1969No. Civ. 11547PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanes, J.
This is an appeal by defendant county from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action brought on the theory of inverse condemnation. Plaintiffs have filed a cross-appeal from that part of the judgment which found the taking to have occurred on November 13, 1963, but have requested that the cross-appeal be dismissed if the judgment appealed from by the county is affirmed. The trial was bifurcated as to the following issues: (1) whether a taking by inverse condemnation had in fact occurred, and (2) damages. The issue on the main appeal is primarily whether the court correctly found a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Kissinger v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Dahl v. City of Palo AltoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.