Legal Opinion
Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 4, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Milonas, J.
In April of 1983, defendant City of New York, through the Department of General Services, solicited bids for contracts to supply fuel oil and kerosene for the period of July 1, 1983 to June 30, 1984. All interested parties were provided with two documents, the standard form of contract, which includes general instructions and conditions, and the requirement contract for fuel oil and kerosene. It is undisputed that these two documents together constitute a binding agreement. According to the standard form of contract, the seller’s bid is considered a firm offer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Balaban-Gordon Co. v. Brighton Sewer District No. 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Depot Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lake Construction & Development Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Transactive Corp. v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Pallette Stone Corp. v. State of New York Office of General ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Seville Construction, Inc. v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998