Legal Opinion

Seville Construction, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Milonas, J. P.

Plaintiff construction company was the successful bidder to rehabilitate seven buildings owned by defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). The issue on appeal is whether NYCHA breached the contract by hiring another firm to perform asbestos removal after Seville commenced its work at the site.

Seville’s $6.2 million bid for the project included $57,000 for a limited amount of asbestos removal in the building basements, to be performed by using a relatively low-cost method, the “glove and bag” technique. Based on inspections almost two years earlier…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Savin Brothers, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Savin Bros. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Lake Construction & Development Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maric Mech., Inc. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API