Legal Opinion
Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1985PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
The issue dispositive of this appeal is whether a broad arbitration clause in a public construction contract which empowers the architect to resolve all contractual disputes submitted by the parties binds those parties to the architect’s *343determination, notwithstanding a provision in the contract with which the determination conflicts.
Defendant, Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (the Authority), invited bids for a certain liquid handling systems contract as part of a project for the construction of a public bus garage in the City of Syracuse. Prior…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.