Legal Opinion
Pallette Stone Corp. v. State of New York Office of General Services
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*870OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Hughes, J.
The issue presented for determination is whether the Office of General Services can permit one of the contractors receiving a multiple-award contract to voluntarily reduce the price of the commodity it is making available to the State after the bids are opened. During 1995, the procurement provisions of the State Finance Law were changed so as to allow the use of multiple-award contracts whereby an award could be made to a number of contractors without any particular purchase order being issued (L 1995, ch 83, § 33). Subdivision (10) of section 163 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jered Contracting Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Signacon Controls, Inc. v. MulroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pallette Stone Corp. v. State Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Embee Corp. v. RinglerNew York Supreme Court · 2002