Legal Opinion

City of Decatur v. Finley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1930No. 8 Div. 96PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaxre, J.

The city of Decatur was proceeding to improve one of its highways known as the ‘‘Old Danville Road.” Appellee here appealed from the assessment toy the city council to the circuit couz-t. In the circuit court, the jury impaneled to assess the increased value of appellee’s contiguous property by reason of the improvement, proceeding- according to the court’s instruction, returned a verdict as follows: “We the jury finds for the plaintiff [meaning, as we interpolate, the city] and fix the damages at $3,100.00 principal and $877.30 interest.” The assessment against appellee’s property by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Naftel v. County of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Fleming v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Geter v. Central Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. McLendon v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. SlatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. TierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Coffee County v. SpurlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Citizens Bank v. RouthCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API