Legal Opinion

McDevitt v. Butte City Ranch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1935No. Civ. 9153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs seek by this action to rescind a contract whereby they were induced, through fraud, to exchange their own securities for trust certificates offered by two of the defendants, who were brokers and gave bonds in defendant surety companies under the Corporate Securities Act. Rescission was adjudged and, upon failure of defendants to return plaintiffs’ securities, judgment was rendered against the surety companies in the sum of $4,000, their value, with interest amounting to $1,953.80. The sole appellant is defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and the appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lewis v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Bryan v. BaymillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Blank v. Olcovich Shoe Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API