Bryan v. Baymiller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate entered into between him and defendant Baymiller Post Company and to recover the sum of $4,250 paid by him on the purchase price of said land under said contract and for damages in case rescission cannot be had.
Defendants answered, denying the material allegations of the complaint and setting up that plaintiff was guilty of laches in attempting to rescind the contract and that he had waived the alleged fraud of defendants, and also filed a cross-complaint demanding judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Thompson v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Schneider v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- McDevitt v. Butte City RanchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tullis v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.