Rohar v. Osborne
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of the negligence of defendants.
Defendants Henry P. Osborne, Sr., and H. P. Osborne, Jr., operated a hardware store known as Shank’s Economy Store. Defendant Iíer-0-Kil Manufacturing Company, a corporation, was the manufacturer of the weed burner which was the instrumentality by which plaintiff was injured. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of ICerO-ICil Manufacturing Company, makers of the instrumentality causing the injury and in favor of plaintiff against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Rae v. California Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- McNeal v. GreenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Monroe v. East Bay Rental ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rainbow Petroleum Co. v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tierstein v. LichtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Tucson General Hospital v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968