Legal Opinion
Tucson General Hospital v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 27, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 390PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
Defendants in a personal injury case complain of the granting by the trial court of plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the court had granted defendants’ motions ' for directed verdict. In changing its position, the trial court stated:
“ * * * that the evidence presented by plaintiffs was sufficient to present a jury question on the issue of negligence and liability under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur as to all defendants, and under the doctrine of implied warranty as to the defendants 1 Picker X-Ray Corporation and Picker X-Ray…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Cobb v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Capps v. American Airlines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
- O'DONNELL v. MavesArizona Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beerman v. Toro Manufacturing Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
- Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Jackson v. HH Robertson Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Morrow v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Maas v. DreherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.