Legal Opinion

Monroe v. East Bay Rental Service

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1952No. Civ. 14769PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

Appellant sued for $5,518, damages for bodily injuries.

A general and special demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained with leave to amend, but after notice the plaintiff declined to amend and judgment was entered that he take nothing and that defendants should recover their costs. Plaintiff then appealed.

Defendants operate a business wherein they rent and lease to the public mechanical equipment including Roto-Tillers. A Roto-Tiller is a plow equipped with a gasoline-driven motor. The theory on which the action was brought, as indicated by the complaint, is that the Roto-Tiller…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rae v. California Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Johnstone v. Panama Pacific International Exposition Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Fisher v. PenningtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Robinson v. ClemonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Allen Anderson Heather Ayres Hillary Ayres, by Her Guardian Ad Litem Karen Ayres Karen Ayres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API