Legal Opinion

People v. Ryan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1925No. Docket No. 1213PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant was convicted on twenty-six counts of an indictment, of which nine counts charged the commission of forgery and seventeen charged the commission of the crime of forgery of a fictitious name. There was no demurrer to the complaint, and the points on appeal relate to the case as made by the evidence.

Appellant’s first point is that the checks described in counts V, XI, XVI, XXIII, XXVII and XXXII were not forgeries or forgeries of a fictitious name within the meaning of the statute. Count V may be taken as representing this group. The defendant was accused therein of the crime of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. EggleshtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. LustmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API