Legal Opinion

People v. Schroeder

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1968No. Crim. 13364PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AISO, J. pro tem. *

By information, defendant Daniel Raymond Schroeder was charged with illegal possession of opium and morphine derivatives (counts I through IX) in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code, with receiving stolen property (count X) in violation of section 496 of the Penal Code, and burglary (count XI) in violation of section 459 of the Penal Code. A jury found him not guilty of burglary (count XI), but guilty on each and every other count. Probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to the state penitentiary on counts V and X. Execution of sentence on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In re HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. ZaccagniniWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BirkestrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API