Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Kardassilaris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2007No. Nos. 2006-1242 and 2006-1243PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, CJ.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} This appeal presents the issue of whether R.C. 5501.22, which provides that the Ohio director of transportation is not “suable” outside of Franklin County except in certain limited circumstances, applies to counterclaims filed in an ongoing appropriation action in another county.

{¶ 2} In 2001, appellee, Director of Transportation Gordon Proctor, initiated separate appropriation actions against appellants Kathy Kardassilaris and others (“Kardassilaris”) and Richard Blank and others (“Blank”) in the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. Proctor sought to take…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bernardini v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sapp v. Franklin County Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Erwin v. BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Havel v. Villa St. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. MedCorp, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API