Legal Opinion

Baldin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2017No. 15-35790, 16-35484UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Amy Baldin appeals the district court’s summary judgment (No. 15-35790) and award of attorney’s fees (No. 16-35484) in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (collectively, “Wells Fargo”). We affirm.(1) Baldin first asserts that the district court erred when it granted summary judgment on Baldin’s claim that Wells Fargo had committed the tort of defamation 1 against her by informing certain credit reporting agencies that she had defaulted on loans made to her by Wells Fargo. We disagree. As the district court pointed out, “ ‘truth’ is a complete…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Stanger v. China Electric Motor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Bahr v. Statesman Journal Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Harris v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  2. Wahab v. WahabDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API