Legal Opinion

Wahab v. Wahab

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 2, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EBRAHIM WAHAB, Case No. 3:23-cv-00098-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. SAIMA WAHAB, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56(a), Defendant Saima Wahab (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Ebrahim Wahab’s (“Plaintiff”) sole claim for defamation. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), and the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons explained…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API