Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 9, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00984Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MICAH HOFFMAN; ARI HOFFMAN, Case No. 3:24-cv-00984-SB Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Micah and Ari Hoffman (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed this diversity action against Defendant USAA Casualty Insurance Company (“Defendant”), asserting state law claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and negligence per se. Plaintiffs now moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 15(a) for leave…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.