Feite v. Goll
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The jury found for defendant; in granting a new trial, the court below said, inter alia: “The court in banc is not in any sense convinced that plaintiff is entitled to a verdict in this case, and if any future trial results in such a verdict it will, of course, be carefully scrutinized,..... but the court does not think that a verdict should be upheld if rendered by a jury under the effect of instructions from the trial judge which, in the opinion of the court, are not justified by the principles of law.” This indicates the court thought that, because of the manner in which the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simmons-Boardman Publishing Co. v. American Boron Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Duaine v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Lasch v. CohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Baldus v. JeremiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Pawlowski v. SczehowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.