Andrews v. Hoeslich
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered January 19, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the coui’t without a jury, in an action of replevin.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action, which was brought by Jacob Andrews against Joseph Hoeslich and the Uncle Joe Diamond Broker, a corporation, to recover possession of a diamond ring, has heretofore been before this court on an appeal prosecuted by the defendant corporation, and a statement of the pleadings and the facts involved may be found in the opinion then filed. Andrews v. Uncle Joe Diamond Broker, 44 Wash. 668, 87 Pac. 947. At the former trial the defendant, Joseph Hoeslich, was not in court. He was served afterwards, and on July 28, 1906, served his answer, in which, after denying allegations of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Sinnott v. . FeiockNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Weeks v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Holliday v. Poston & SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baron v. Peoples National Bank of SecaucusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Armour v. SeixasWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- White v. MileyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Gordan v. BriodyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Theodore v. Washington National Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.