Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Kimmell

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 13, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-4056-SPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In this action, filed March 21, 1989, plaintiff alleges that the Kansas Animal Dealers Act, K.S.A. 47-1701, et seq. (Supp.1989), violates the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses of the United States Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law, and the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988, as well as 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Kennel Club v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Johnson v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. Good v. Zoning Hearing Board of Heidelberg TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Zimmerman v. WolffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API