Legal Opinion

Good v. Zoning Hearing Board of Heidelberg Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 2009No. 761 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this zoning appeal, Scott L. Good and Mary J. Good (collectively, Applicants) challenge the Zoning Hearing Board of Heidelberg Township’s (ZHB) decision that granted their request for a special exception to operate a dog kennel, but attached 28 conditions to the grant of the special exception. On Applicants’ appeal, the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County (trial court) struck two of the conditions. Applicants ask this Court to strike an additional eight conditions on the grounds these conditions are preempted by federal or state law and do not serve a legitimate…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Nutter v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pietropaolo v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. DOMIJO, LLC v. McLainCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Hunterstown Ruritan Club v. Straban Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Markwest Liberty Midstream & Res., LLC v. Cecil Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. D. & S. Fask v. ZHB of the Twp. of HaverfordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API